Colin Powell: Dishonest, Dishonorable, and Despicable

Why is Colin Powell given even a modicum of any respect when the man's record shows he has no integrity and has always been lying, brown nosing, sycophant, who reached his goal as a dishonest Washington insider.

Why Obama even talked to this self-absorbed liar is a mystery.

If President Obama takes any advice from Powell, he's lost.  

His dishonorable record is appalling and began back in the 1960's as he was clawing his way up the seniority ladder.

Colin Powell's peripheral, yet deliberately myopic role, in the My Lai cover-up in Vietnam was disgusting in addition to his role in another Vietnam controversy, a court martial of a general who gunned down Vietnamese civilians from a helicopter for sport in which Powell sided with the general, knowing which side his bread was buttered on.

Powell was also a player in the treasonous Reagan's Iran-Contra scandal.  As Robert Parry reports in Consortium News:
 

"The behavior of Powell and Weinberger in the following days also suggested that they knew an arms-for-hostage swap was under way.


"According to Weinberger’s diary, he and Powell eagerly awaited a release of an American hostage in Lebanon, the payoff for the clandestine weapons shipment to Iran.


"Defense procurement officials said that without Powell’s manipulation of the process, the Pentagon’s internal auditing systems would have alerted the military brass that thousands of TOW anti-tank missiles and other sophisticated weaponry were headed to Iran, designated a terrorist state.

"Weinberger officially handed Powell the job of shipping the missiles to Iran on January 17, 1986. That was the day Reagan signed an intelligence finding, a formal authorization that is required by law for the conduct of covert operations, in this case, the transfer of arms from U.S. stockpiles and their shipment to Iran..

"If there had been an air attack on U.S. forces in Europe during the drawdown, the HAWK missile defense batteries might not have had the necessary spare parts to counter an enemy attack.


"As implemented by Powell, the Iran initiative had taken priority over both legal safeguards and the safety of U.S. soldiers around the world."


Then, as Secretary of State under Dubya, Colin Powell deliberately lied to the American people, the UN, and the world about Iraq's nuclear weapons program, to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq which has cost hundreds of thousands of American military and Iraqis' lives.


As Jonathan Stein reported at Mother Jones"As much criticism as Powell has received for this—he calls it "painful" and something that will 'always be a part of my record'—it hasn't been close to what's justified. Powell was far more than just horribly mistaken: the evidence is conclusive that he fabricated evidence and ignored repeated warnings that what he was saying was false."


Now, in an interview with Rachel Maddow, Powell claims he doesn't know whether torture 'would be considered criminal.'   This, of course, comes from the quintessential model of knows how to cover his ass through the years and then, as member of the Bush high level torture team.


From Think Progress: "Last night, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow interviewed former Secretary of State Colin Powell. Unlike many journalists, Maddow asked him about — and pressed him repeatedly on — his role in approving torture against detainees. Specifically, she asked him about reports that he was among nine White House “principals” who approved torturetechniques so specifically that “interrogation sessions were almost choreographed.”


"Powell refused to acknowledge his role in these meetings, and claimed ignorance about long-released legal memos that specifically authorized torture. Choosing his words carefully, he would say only that, “at least from the State Department standpoint,” it was important to stand by the Geneva Conventions. Powell also questioned whether tactics like sleep deprivation, stress positions, or waterboarding were “criminal” — despite specific U.S. statutes and international law forbidding torture:

MADDOW: If there was a meeting though at which senior officials were saying, were discussing and giving the approval for sleep deprivation, stress positions, waterboarding. Were those officials committing crimes when they were giving their authorization?

POWELL: You’re asking me a legal question. I mean, I don’t know that any of these items would be considered criminal. And I will wait for whatever investigations that the government or the Congress intends to pursue with this.

"Throughout the interview, Powell shirked any responsibility to account for his actions by deferring to hypothetical “investigations” or pointing to the unreleased — and possibly non-existent — “written record” of these meetings as providing the ultimate final word. As Maddow pointed, it’s unclear whether any such investigations will ever take place."

Unfortunately, Powell and members of the Reagan and Bush regimes, who should be treated like the excrement one wipes off one's shoes, are treated with an undeserved, obscene display of respect, even by the Obama administration.   

No wonder the people are angry.  It's not just the economy.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.