The more things change the more they stay the same.  That is the lesson regarding the Joe Lieberman kerfuffle.

 

Democratic leadership on Capitol Hill remains spineless, apparently permanently sunk in their minority mind set of kowtowing to their Republican colleagues who don't even have to say boo to scare them.

 

As Glenn Greenwald explains: "It is worth remembering that the Democrats who are going to exert dominant political control are the same ones who have provoked so much scorn -- rightfully so -- over the last several years, and particularly since 2006.  This is the same Democratic Party leadership which funded the Iraq War without conditions (and voted to authorize it in the first place); massively expanded the President's warrantless eavesdropping powers; immunized lawbreaking telecoms; enacted the Patriot Act and then renewed it with virtually no changes; didn't even bother to mount a filibuster to stop the Military Commissions Act; refrained from pursuing any meaningful investigations of Bush lawbreaking; confirmed every last extremist Bush nominee, from Michael McConnell to Michael Mukasey; acquiesced to even the worst and most lawless Bush policies when they were briefed on them; and on and on and on.  None of that has changed.  That is still who they are.

"Joe Lieberman didn't merely campaign against Barack Obama and several other Democrats.  That's the least of his sins.  He was not only among the most vocal supporters of the Iraq War, but at least as bad, has endorsed and supported every last radical Bush policy to expand executive power and surveillance activities while destroying core constitutional liberties and checks and balances.  He used his Chairmanship for only one purpose: to block oversight into Bush scandals and corruption.  He has spouted the most defamatory attacks, not only against Barack Obama, but against war opponents generally.  More significantly still, Democrats in his own state -- his own constituents --booted him out of the party, no longer wanting to be represented by him. 

"That is who Senate Democrats appear well on their way to selecting to serve as their Chairman of Homeland Security, of all committees.  That's because nothing that Lieberman has done really bothers them.  Endorsing the Iraq War and the full panoply of radical Bush policies isn't disqualifying in the least because so many of them also endorsed that and support it, or, at the very least, it's not a priority for them.  They care even less what their "base" thinks, what the so-called "Left" wants.  Few things in this world are less likely than them ever taking even a mild stand -- such as stripping Lieberman of his Chair -- in order to defend some sort of political principle, or to punish ineptitude, or to announce that there are certain lines to the Right that can't be crossed.  They don't do that.  They never have.  And it shouldn't surprise anyone that they won't now....."