Framers of Our Constitution Would be Appalled At These Events

What do you get when you mix together a threat of martial law, an army brigade assigned to "help" the Department of Homeland Security, and NSA spying on American citizens?   Well it's already here and has been for quite awhile under the criminal Bush regime: a totalitarian, fascist, proto military dictatorship in the US that has shredded the Constitution or as Bush called it just a goddamned piece of paper.
 
With the help of a spineless Congress, this administration is turning this country into all that the framers of the Constitution feared.
 
From ABC News"Despite pledges by President George W. Bush and American intelligence officials to the contrary, hundreds of US citizens overseas have been eavesdropped on as they called friends and family back home, according to two former military intercept operators who worked at the giant National Security Agency (NSA) center in Fort Gordon, Georgia.
 
"These were just really everyday, average, ordinary Americans who happened to be in the Middle East, in our area of intercept and happened to be making these phone calls on satellite phones," said Adrienne Kinne, a 31-year old US Army Reserves Arab linguist assigned to a special military program at the NSA's Back Hall at Fort Gordon from November 2001 to 2003.

"She said US military officers, American journalists and American aid workers were routinely intercepted and "collected on" as they called their offices or homes in the United States. inne described the contents of the calls as "personal, private things with Americans who are not in any way, shape or form associated with anything to do with terrorism."

"Another intercept operator, former Navy Arab linguist, David Murfee Faulk, 39, said he and his fellow intercept operators listened into hundreds of Americans picked up using phones in Baghdad's Green Zone from late 2003 to November 2007.

" 'Calling home to the United States, talking to their spouses, sometimes their girlfriends, sometimes one phone call following another,' said Faulk.

"The accounts of the two former intercept operators, who have never met and did not know of the other's allegations, provide the first inside look at the day to day operations of the huge and controversial US terrorist surveillance program."

A couple of weeks ago I wrote the following:  "A U.S Army brigade is being assigned to operate in this country federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense of civil authorities.  This is very troubling and signals a dangerous precedent.

"Just as the military as an occupation force in Iraq has been a failure, so to, the use of military for policing operations in this country is a recipe for disaster and is, in addition, against the law."
 
Now, according to The Progressive, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) is concerned about this brigade's assignment.

"Leahy was instrumental in getting Congress to repeal the "Insurrection Act Rider" in the 2006 defense appropriations bill. That rider had given the President sweeping power to use military troops in ways contrary to the Insurrection Act and Posse Comitatus Act. The rider authorized the President to have troops patrol our streets in response to disasters, epidemics, and any "condition" he might cite.

"Leahy said last December that this rider "made it easier for the President to take over the Guard and to declare martial law." In a Senate statement on April 24, 2007, he cautioned against inserting the military "into domestic situations." As he put it: "One of the distinguishing characteristics of the United States is that we do not use the military to patrol our communities and neighborhoods." A few months before that, he warned that we must ensure that "the military is not used in a way that offends and endangers some of our most cherished values and liberties."

"The repeal of the rider was signed by Bush on January 28, though Amy Goodman reports that "Bush attached a signing statement that he did not feel bound by the repeal."

"The roles the 1st Brigade Combat Team will take on at NorthCom are a bit unclear.

"That directive talks about "military support in dealing with the actual or anticipated consequences of civil emergencies." Those civil emergencies could be "arising during peace, war, or transition to war."

"While it states that such support "does not include military support to local law enforcement," there is a provision in the directive for the military to take over functions of the civilian government.

"Military personnel 'shall not perform any function of civil government unless absolutely necessary on a temporary basis under conditions of Immediate Response. Any commander who is directed, or undertakes, to perform such functions shall facilitate the reestablishment of civil responsibility at the earliest possible time,' the document states."

And Existentialist Cowboy, in a posting about the bailout being unconstitutional revealed this shocker: In a video on the Cowboy site, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) stated, on the floor of the House, that some members were panicked by the threat of martial law if the bailout bill did not pass.

This criminal Bush regime has turned this nation into an Orwellian nightmare.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.