Diebold Admits Its Counting Software Does Not Count Votes Correctly
"In fact, it actually loses votes, by not counting them at all, yet gives the system administrator no indication that the votes were not counted. Instead, it tells them that all votes have been counted correctly. This bug has been in Diebold's software --- where it remains to this day-- for years. Diebold has only admitted it now that it's been found by someone else (a number of counties in Ohio, of all places) and with the 2008 Presidential election less than 80 days away. Washington Post's coverage here.
"Coinciding with that startling admission, the Election Assistance Commission (EAC)'s Gracia Hillman, one of the two Democratic-recommended appointees, has gone on public record stating that the federal certification testing process is too stringent.
"While all of that was made clear in Ellen's blog item, I found both of the above points so remarkable that I wanted to underscore them now that I've finally made it to Denver (or at least Boulder, for the moment), since I was simply stunned to read it myself after getting back on the grid.
"Is anybody there? Does anybody care?
"UPDATE: CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight covered the stunning admission by Diebold on their show Friday. Here it is (thanks to Alan Breslauer, as usual!) ...
UPDATE 8:43pm PT: McClatchy's Greg Gordon picks up the ball, and advances it a bit, noting the failure in oversight by the feds which allowed for the failure, as we've been trying to get across here for years. He begins this way...
' 'WASHINGTON” Disclosure of an election computer glitch that could drop ballot totals for entire precincts is stirring new worries that an unofficial laboratory testing system failed for years to detect an array of flaws in $1.5 billion worth of voting equipment sold nationwide since 2003.
Texas-based Premier Elections Solutions [Diebold] last week alerted at least 1,750 jurisdictions across the country that special precautions are needed to address the problem in tabulation software affecting all 19 of its models dating back a decade.' "
In 2000, the Supreme Court made sure that Dubya was crowned the king, while voters were told that there is no right to vote contained in the Constitution. In 2004, Diebold and other Republican owned electronic touch screen voting machine companies guaranteed that Bush would win as the questionable vote count in Ohio proved. Now, in 2008, these same Republican touch screen voting and counting machines companies that snarfed up billions courtesy of a Republican controlled Congress misnamed Help America Vote Act (HAVA), still have the ability to make sure that their software steals votes by flipping them to J. Sid McSame.
What do Democratis and their party intend to do about it?




Comments