Bush Rendition Victim Gets Rare Re-Hearing by 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals

Justice may still triumph for Canadian citizen Maher Arar who was extrodinary rendered by the Bush regime to Syria for torture.
 
Finally, the Bush administration may have to answer in court for what they did to Mr. Arar.
 
Some highlights from the Toronto Star: "Canadian torture victim Maher Arar has been given an unexpected “and very rare“ opportunity to take another crack at winning redress from the Bush administration in a New York court.

"The Second Circuit Court of Appeals announced yesterday it would convene at least 13 judges in December for another hearing for Arar, the Ottawa engineer who was tortured and jailed in a Syrian prison after being whisked out of JFK Airport in September 2002, under a U.S. practice known as "extraordinary rendition.''

"A three-judge panel dismissed Arar's lawsuit in June, but the dissenting judge said the ruling gave the U.S. government licence "to violate constitutional rights with virtual impunity.''

"Yesterday's decision keeps alive the possibility that Arar could still become the first rendition victim to force the Bush administration to admit its role and compensate a victim in a case it maintains was an immigration matter.

"The court made its decision before it even received a petition from Arar's lawyers to examine the suit again, a decision legal observers said was extremely rare.

"Even when petitioned, the Second Circuit convenes the entire bench less than once a year, based on recent records.

"This is good news,'' said Maria LaHood, of the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights lawyer who represents Arar.

"We are getting another shot and certainly the court thinks mistakes were made in the original ruling.

"This means Maher may finally get justice in this country.''

"Arar is seeking unspecified damages in a lawsuit that names, among others, John Aschroft, who was attorney general when Arar was rendered; Larry Thompson, the deputy attorney general who signed the rendition order; and Tom Ridge, a potential vice-presidential running mate for Republican John McCain, who was head of Homeland Security when Arar was rendered.

"In its June decision, the three-judge panel ruled Arar could not petition that court for redress because, under U.S. law, a court already exists where removal orders could be challenged.

"In the Arar case, however, testimony has made it clear that he was never given the opportunity to challenge the decision before he was flown out of the country."

Given the Bush regime's record on torture and extraordinary rendition, Busy, Cheney and the rest of their high and cabinet level torture team should be sitting in the doc at The Hague on January 21, 2009.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.