French President Leads On Defusing Russia-Georgia Conflict

The latest news about the Russia-Georgia conflict had President Sarkozy of France jetting to Moscow and President Medvedev of Russia announcing a cease fire at their joint news conference.
 
Bush, of course, was still in China bloviating and preening in his best Alfred E. "What, me worry" Neuman imitation while Condoleeza Rice, a so-called Russia expert and US Secretary of State, chided for staying on vacation, finally issued a statement today and then refused to take even one press question.
 
Sid McSame meanwhile continued his warmongering against Russia, showing he knows absolutely nothing about the situation or the history of Georgia and South Ossetiaand hypocritically ignoring and not mentioning that his top foreign policy adviser lobbied for many years for Georgia, and was pro-Georgia and very anti-Russia.  He rubbed off on McSame who supports Georgia's entry into NATO (which ain't gonna happen now), drumming Russia out of the G8, and now rattling sabers on Georgia' s behalf.  
 
Basically, Georgia's President Mikhail Saakashvili (which McSame can't even pronounce) decided to imitate Dubya and invaded the semi-autonomous region of South Ossetia which has been policed by Russian "peacekeepers" for a few years.  It's a territory whose people voted for independence two years ago, are ethnically non-Georgian, have their their own language, carry Russina passports and depend economically on Russia. 
 
Bush and crew and McSame are dangerous twits who, rather than defusing the situation, threw oil on the fire.
 
 
Robert Parry at Consortium News captures the hypocrisy, bumbling and stupid warmongering of the neocon Bush regime and Sid McSame with this: "Apparently, context is everything. So, the United States attacking Grenada or Nicaragua or Panama or Iraq.....is justified even if the reasons sometimes don't hold water or don't hold up before the United Nations, The Hague or other institutions of international law.

"However, when Russia attacks Georgia in a border dispute over Georgia’s determination to throttle secession movements in two semi-autonomous regions, everyone must agree that Georgia's sovereignty is sacrosanct and Russia must be condemned.

"U.S. newspapers, such as the New York Times, see nothing risible about publishing a statement from President George W. Bush declaring that "Georgia is a sovereign nation and its territorial integrity must be respected."

"No one points out that Bush should have zero standing enunciating such a principle. Iraq also was a sovereign nation, but Bush invaded it under false pretenses, demolished its army, overthrew its government and then conducted a lengthy military occupation resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

"When asked questions about international law {regarding the Iraq invasin] , Bush would joke: "International law? I better call my lawyer."

"The neocons' contempt for international law goes back even further“ to the 1980s and the illegal contra war against Nicaragua and the invasion of Panama. Only in the last few days have the neocons discovered an appreciation for multilateral institutions and the principles of non-intervention.

"Despite this history, leading U.S. newspapers don't see hypocrisy. Instead, they have thrown open their pages to prominent neocons and other advocates of U.S.-led invasions so these thinkers now can denounce Russia while not mentioning any contradictions.

"While major U.S. news outlets may be comfortable wearing blinders that let them see only wrongdoing by others, the rest of the world views the outrage from Bush and the neocons over Russia as a stunning double standard.

"This larger problem is that the Bush administration “along with its neocon allies and many establishment Democrats“ have lost any credibility with the world community when it comes to invoking international law.

"It has been as if the rules moved on separate tracks, one set for the United States and one set for everyone else“ and it was impolite to notice.

"Since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, however, it has become harder to ignore Washington's double standards. Also, after the five-plus-year fiasco in Iraq, the Bush administration must confront both the limitations on its own imperial reach and the fact that it has done grave damage to the protocols of international behavior."

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.