John Sidney McBush Presidency Would Lead US To Permanent Beggar Nation Status
If hotheaded John Sidney McBush wins the presidency, the US will be begging with an even larger tin cup.
Like Bush, and by his own admission, McCain knows very little about the economy which he now denies he said, flip-flopper and liar that he is.
While talking about eliminating wasteful spending, he hasn't indicated how he will pay for his wholehearted embrace of continuing Bush tax cuts for the 2% have's and have more's, such as McCain and his wife, from whom all his riches flow.
As far as wasteful spending, McCain isn't referring to the trillions in debt incurred by him and his colleagues in a decade plus Republican controlled Congress, rubber stamping every Bush expense such as for the Iraq invasion and occupation, crony war profiteers, tax cuts for the rich but probably means cutting Medicare and other social programs to the bone and increasing the financial struggles of typical, hardworking Americans while protecting the wealthy and his special friends, corporate lobbyists.
In a Reuters report today, "John McCain's reputation for "straight talk" has helped him clinch the Republican presidential nomination but budget experts say his numbers do not add up.
"McCain's promises to reduce wasteful spending if elected president in November would not begin to cover the costs of his proposed tax cuts, analysts say.
"He also has not yet explained how he would rein in the health-care and retirement costs expected to swamp the federal budget as some 77 million people retire from the U.S. work force in the coming decades.
"On top of that, a President McCain would inherit a $400 billion budget deficit, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that cost nearly $200 billion per year and a similar bill for interest payments on the $10 trillion national debt.
" 'This is one of the most fiscally irresponsible plans we've seen by a presidential candidate in a long time,' said Robert Greenstein, executive director of the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
" 'I don't think anybody's numbers add up when they run for president," said Jared Bernstein of the liberal Economic Policy Institute. "I do fear that (McCain's) don't add up the most.' "
Actually, historically, the economy and even the stock market do better under Democratic administrations.
John Sidney McBush would be a dangerous Republican president who would complete Dubya's ruin of the US and its economy and reduce it to a permanent beggar nation.
Like Bush, and by his own admission, McCain knows very little about the economy which he now denies he said, flip-flopper and liar that he is.
While talking about eliminating wasteful spending, he hasn't indicated how he will pay for his wholehearted embrace of continuing Bush tax cuts for the 2% have's and have more's, such as McCain and his wife, from whom all his riches flow.
As far as wasteful spending, McCain isn't referring to the trillions in debt incurred by him and his colleagues in a decade plus Republican controlled Congress, rubber stamping every Bush expense such as for the Iraq invasion and occupation, crony war profiteers, tax cuts for the rich but probably means cutting Medicare and other social programs to the bone and increasing the financial struggles of typical, hardworking Americans while protecting the wealthy and his special friends, corporate lobbyists.
In a Reuters report today, "John McCain's reputation for "straight talk" has helped him clinch the Republican presidential nomination but budget experts say his numbers do not add up.
"McCain's promises to reduce wasteful spending if elected president in November would not begin to cover the costs of his proposed tax cuts, analysts say.
"He also has not yet explained how he would rein in the health-care and retirement costs expected to swamp the federal budget as some 77 million people retire from the U.S. work force in the coming decades.
"On top of that, a President McCain would inherit a $400 billion budget deficit, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that cost nearly $200 billion per year and a similar bill for interest payments on the $10 trillion national debt.
" 'This is one of the most fiscally irresponsible plans we've seen by a presidential candidate in a long time,' said Robert Greenstein, executive director of the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
" 'I don't think anybody's numbers add up when they run for president," said Jared Bernstein of the liberal Economic Policy Institute. "I do fear that (McCain's) don't add up the most.' "
Actually, historically, the economy and even the stock market do better under Democratic administrations.
John Sidney McBush would be a dangerous Republican president who would complete Dubya's ruin of the US and its economy and reduce it to a permanent beggar nation.




Comments